Expedient Historicity; a Critique of the Thought and Opinions of Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd and Mohammed Arkoun

Authors

1 PhD Student of Political Thought, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Political Sciences, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran

10.22081/jips.2023.75469

Abstract

We may consider Abu Zayd and Arkoun as the pioneers of the methodic and detailed idea of historicity of religion and theology in contemporary Islamic thought. Making use of the achievements of humanities and social sciences, especially epistemology, hermeneutics and other new methodologies are the prominent features of the works written by these two authors. However, by a more precise investigation of these two thinkers’ works, it seems that there is a kind of expediency or conservatism in the statement and pursuing the logical succession of their opinions.  In this article, we aim at dealing with and exploring this very aspect in Abu Zayd and Arkoun’s thought. Accordingly, the main question in the present inquiry is as follows: “Does such a conservative aspect exist in the works of these two thinkers?” and, in the next stage, “What are the reasons and causes for it?” The research hypothesis is as follows: “Some evidence, ambiguities and inconsistencies show the existence of such an aspect in those works and the role of mental clichés and psychological backgrounds, on the one hand, and social requisites and dilemmas, on the other hand, can be considered as the most important factors.” The research approach is text-based and our method is descriptive-analytical. Besides, we have used Leo Strauss’s theory, called ‘esotericism’, to understand those aspects based on the writers’ conservatism. Fear of ‘persecution’ and fanatic reactions, considering some expedient considerations aiming at more gradual influence on the audience, and the effects – even unconscious – of some psychological-mental clichés and images can be regarded as the most important reasons and causes for the existence of inconsistent and conservative aspects in Abu Zayd and Arkoun’s thought.

Keywords

References

  1. Abu Zayd, N. H. (1992). A Critique of the Religious Discourse (Trans. Yousefi Ishkavari, H. and Javaher Kalam, M.). Tehran: Yadavaran.
  2. Abu Zayd, N. H. (1995a). Al-Naṣṣ, al-Sulṭa, al-Ḥaqīqa (Trans. Musavi Khalkhali, E.). Tehran: Niloofar.
  3. Abu Zayd, N. H. (1995b). Al-Naṣṣ, al-Sulṭa, al-Ḥaqī Beirut: al-Markaz al-Theqafi al-‘Arabi.
  4. Abu Zayd, N. H. (1996). Al-Imām Shāfi‘ī wa Taʾsīs al-Īdiulujiyya al-Wasaṭiyya (2nd). Cairo: Maktaba Madbouli.
  5. Abu Zayd, N. H. (1998). Al-Ittijāh al ‘Aqlī fil-Tafsīr: Dirāsat fī Qaḍiyya al-Majāz fil-Qurān ‘Ind al-Mu‘tazila (Trans. Musavi Khalkhali, E.). Tehran: Niloofar.
  6. Abu Zayd, N. H. (1998). Mafhūm al-Naṣṣ: Dirāsat fī ‘Ulūm al-Qurān (Trans. Kariminia, M., 3rd). Tehran: Tarh Now.
  7. Abu Zayd, N. H. (2004). Hākadhā Takallam Ibn ‘Arabī (Trans. Musavi Khalkhali, E.). Tehran: Niloofar.
  8. (1982). “Comment lire le Coran?” (ed. Aqaie, S. A.) in Khiradnāmayi Hamshahrī, no. 21, pp. 56-59.
  9. Arkoun, M. (1973). Contribution a l'Etude de l'Humanisme Arabe au IVe/Xe Siecle: Miskawyh Philosophe et Historien (Trans. Mousavi Khalkhali, E.). Tehran: Tarh Naqd.
  10. Arkoun, M. (1986). Tārīkhiyya al-Fikr al-‘Arabī al-Islāmī (Trans. Hamdavi, R.). Tehran: Negah Mo‘aser.
  11. Arkoun, M. (1991). Min al-Ijtihād ilal-Naqd al-‘Aql al-Islāmī (Trans. Khalaji, M. M.). Tehran: Ide.
  12. Arkoun, M. (1996a). Al-Fikr al-Islāmī, Qirāʾatun ‘Ilmī (Trans. Savari, ‘A.). Tehran: Nasl Aftab.
  13. Arkoun, M. (1996b). Al-‘Ilmana wal-Dīn: al-Islām, al-Masīhiyya, al-Gharb (Trans. Mohammadi, K. and Rastgoo, B.). Tehran: Negah Mo‘ā
  14. Arkoun, M. (1996c). al-Fikr al-Islāmī: Qirāʾat al-‘Ilmiyya (Trans. Hashem Saleh, 2nd). Beirut: Markaz al-Inma al-Qowmi.
  15. Arkoun, M. (1999). Al-Fikr al-Uṣūlī wa Istiḥāla al-Taʾṣīl (Trans. Hashem Saleh). Beirut: Dar al-Saqi.
  16. Arkoun, M. (2005). Al-Qurān, min al-Tafsīr al-Mowrūth ilā Taḥlīl al-Khiṭāb al-Dīnī (Trans. and ed. Hashem Saleh). Beirut: Dar al-Tali‘a.
  17. Fromm, E. (1941). Escape from Freedom (Trans. Fouladvand, ‘I., 26th). Tehran: Morvarid.
  18. Ibn Rushd Andalusi, M. A. (1979). Faṣl al-Maqāl fī mā Bayn al-Ḥikma wal-Sharī‘a mil al-Ittiṣāl (Trans. Sajjadi, S. J.). Tehran: Society of Philosophy of Iran. [In Persian]
  19. Ibn Rushd Andalusi, M. A. (1998). Al-Kashf ‘an Manāhij al-Adilla fī ‘Aqāʾid al-Milla. Beirut: Markaz Dirasat Wahdat al-‘Arabiyya.
  20. Khalaji, M. M. (1998). Ārā wa Andīshahāyi Duktur Mohammed Tehran: Center for Cultural-International Studies of Management of Islamic Studies. [In Persian]
  21. Mezler, Arthur M. (2014). Philosophy Between The Lines: The Lost History of The Esoteric Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  22. Movahedinia, M. (2019). Andīshayi Siyāsī, Sūyayi Pinhān Andīshayi Shī‘ī. Tehran: Tarh Now. [In Persian]
  23. Rezvani, M. (1392). Strauss wa Falsafayi Siyāsī Islāmī (2nd). Qom: Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute. [In Persian]
  24. Strauss, L. (1945). Farabi’s Plato. New York: The American Academy for Jewish Research.
  25. Strauss, L. (1988). Persecution and the Art of Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

 

Journal of Islamic Political Studies
Volume 5, Issue 2
July 2023
Pages 189-216

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics