The present study aimed at exploring the prophethood and administration in Imam Mohammad Ghazali’s political thought. The research method was descriptive-analytical and the results showed that the foundation of Ghazali’s political thought is priority of Sharia. The point worth noting is that the way Sharia is preferred in Ghazali’s thought is a posteriori. Ghazali considers politics from the perspective of the human’s material life. Finally, he turns to the reforming mission of politics and explains the correlation between politics and piety under the inner attitude and the concept of reformation in individual and social life. Ghazali discusses prophethood in various forms, but what manifests itself in his final thought is paying attention to one’s heart, inner side and insight in prophethood. Paying attention to one’s inner side is Ghazali’s solution for reconciling religion and world. He also, like other Muslim thinkers, maintains that true felicity is the felicity in hereafter. He considers the way to achieve that important goal to be not imitating and repeating a practice in its outer form; rather, he searches for it inside one’s heart, the heartfelt belief and inner purity. Ghazali must be considered as an inquirer who was seeking sincerity and divine proximity up to the end of his life. He considered this proximity in resorting to the Prophet as God’s supreme creature. He compensates the Prophet’s absence by resorting to mysticism, inner attitude and moral loyalty to the prophetic teachings. He maintains that the solution to society’s problems is in the hands of the religious scholars and rulers who have made firm decision to reform the situation.
Ghazali, M. (1954). Makātīb Fārsī (ed. Iqbal, ‘I.). Tehran: Parliament Printing House – Ibn Sina Bookstore. [In Persian]
Ghazali, M. (1972). Naṣīḥat al-Mulūk (ed. and anno. Humaʾi, J.). Tehran: Society of National Works. [In Persian]
Ghazali, M. (1983). al-Munqidh min al-Ḍilāl (Shak wa Shinākht) (Trans. Aʾina-vand, S., 2nd). Tehran: Amirkabir Publishing Institute. [In Persian]
Ghazali, M. (1987). Iḥyāʾ ‘Ulūm al-Dī (vol. 1, Trans. Kharazmi, M. M., ed. Khadiv Jam, H.). Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications. [In Persian]
Ghazali, M. (1995). Mīzān al-‘Amal (Trans. Kasmaʾi, A. ‘A.). Tehran: Soroush. [In Persian]
Ghazali, M. (2001). Kīmiyāyi Sa‘ādat (ed. Khadiv Jam, H.). Tehran: Scientific Cultural Publications. [In Persian]
Ghazali, M. (2005). Qawā‘id al-‘Aqāyid yā I‘tiqādnāmayi Ghazālī (Trans. Halabi, ‘A. A.). Tehran: Jami Publications. [In Persian]
Ghazali, M. (1993). Al-Iqtiāād fil-I‘tiqād (expo. Bu-Muhlam, ‘A). Beirut: Dar w Maktaba al-Hilal.
Ghazali, M. (1998). Bidāyat al-Hidayat (anno. Darvish, ‘A. M.). Beirut: Dar Sader.
Ghazali, M. (2000). Tahāfut al-Falāsifa: Qaddama Lahū wa Ḍabaṭa Naṣṣahū: Ahmad Shamsuddīn, Manshūrāt: Muhammad Ali Beyḍūn, al-Ṭay‘at al-Ūlā. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya. [In Arabic]
Laoust, H. (1970). La Politique de Ghazali (Trans. Mozaffari, M.). Tehran: Foundation of Iranian Culture.
Poor-Javadi, N. A. (2002). Du Mujaddid: Pazhūhishhāyī darbārayi Muhammad Ghazālī wa Fakhr Rāzī. Tehran: Center of University Publications. [In Persian]
Qader, H. (1991). Andīshayi Siyāsī Ghazālī. Tehran: Office of Political and International Studies, Ministry of Foreign Affairs. [In Persian]
Qaderi, H. (2000). Andīshayi Siyāsī dar Islām wa Īrān (4th). Tehran: SAMT. [In Persian]
Mohammadi Kia, T. (2023). Prophethood and Administration in Imam Mohammad Ghazali’s Political Thought. Journal of Islamic Political Studies, 5(2), 166-188. doi: 10.22081/jips.2024.68099.1046
MLA
Tayebeh Mohammadi Kia. "Prophethood and Administration in Imam Mohammad Ghazali’s Political Thought", Journal of Islamic Political Studies, 5, 2, 2023, 166-188. doi: 10.22081/jips.2024.68099.1046
HARVARD
Mohammadi Kia, T. (2023). 'Prophethood and Administration in Imam Mohammad Ghazali’s Political Thought', Journal of Islamic Political Studies, 5(2), pp. 166-188. doi: 10.22081/jips.2024.68099.1046
VANCOUVER
Mohammadi Kia, T. Prophethood and Administration in Imam Mohammad Ghazali’s Political Thought. Journal of Islamic Political Studies, 2023; 5(2): 166-188. doi: 10.22081/jips.2024.68099.1046