The Approach to Shiite Studies in British Academic Institutes

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Professor, Contemporary Philosophy, Baqir al-Olum University, Qom, Iran

2 Ph.D. Candidate, Shia Studies, University of Religions and Denominations, Qom, Iran

3 Associate Professor, University of Religions and Denominations, Qom, Iran

Abstract

In contemporary British academic institutes and centers, a range of research is conducted on the Islamic world, including Shiite studies. British researchers have for long asserted that their approach to Islamic and Shiite studies is historical, claiming that unlike earlier anti-Islamic research by the Church, they just aim to learn more about Islamic and Shiite beliefs, without engaging in theological debates about Shiism and its doctrines. Contemporary Western, and particularly British, scholars claim to diverge from evangelical and colonialist approaches and instead adopt a scholarly and academic approach. However, it appears that think tanks in the UK that shape general policies may not align with the claims made by these researchers. We examine these two approaches by draw ing upon image-making theory and its application in individual and organizational decision-making. On this theory, images are grounds of such decisions, and reality only makes sense within such images. I argue that “images” form the basis of Islamic and Shiite studies. Given this perspective, we address the following question: Is the approach to Shiite studies in the UK consistent with the claims made by British scholars?

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. A group of authors. (2009). Challenges before Western Shiite studies and their solutions. Qom: Khakriz Publication. [In Persian]
  2. Astarābādī, A. (1988). Taʾwīl al-āyāt al-ẓāhira fi faḍāʾil al-ʿitrat al-ṭāhira. Qom: Islamic Publishing Institute. [In Arabic]
  3. Baḥrānī, S. H. (1999). Al-Insaf fi Nass ali al-Imam al-Athni Eshar, Tehran, Farhang Islamic Publishing House. [In Arabic]
  4. Bald, J., Harber, A., Robinson, N. & Schiff, E. (2009). Faith Schools We Can Believe. In: Ensuring that tolerant and democratic values are upheld in every part of Britain's education system. Available at Policy Exchange, URL= https://www.policyexchange.org.uk/wp-content/ uploads/2016/ 09/faith-schools-we-can-believe-in-nov-10.pdf
  5. Bright, M. (2006). When Progressives Treat with Reactionaries: The British State's Flirtation with Radical Islamism. London: Policy Exchange.
  6. Castells, E. (2001). The Information Age: The Power and Identity (H. Chavoshian, trans.). Tehran: Tarh-e Now.
  7. Cheloongar, M.A. (2011). Orientalism viewed sympathetically: methodology of Orientalists concerning the intellectual and doctrinal principles of Shiism. Sooreh andisheh (54-55), pp. 300-305. [In Persian]
  8. Cook, M. (2001). Commanding right and forbidding wrong in Islamic thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Eftekhari, A. (2008). Two Islamophobia images: negative and positive in Western propaganda. Media quarterly, 20(3), pp. 29-44. [In Persian]
  10. Faramarz Gharamaleki, Ahad. (2006). Methodology of religious studies. Mashhad: Razavi University of Islamic Sciences. [In Persian]
  11. Gerholm, T. & Lithman, Y.G. (1988). The New Islamic presence in Western Europe. London: Mansell.
  12. Ghasemi, H. & Hatamzadeh, A. (2018). The role of think tanks in promoting Islamophobia in Britain: the case study of the Policy Exchange think tank. Political studies of the Islamic world, 7(25), pp. 59-78. [In Persian]
  13. Ghazanfari, S. & Vahidi, S.A. (2015). A Critical Examination of of Robert Gleave’s View about the Succession of Imam Ali and Ghadir. Shiʿa Pajoohi, 1(3), pp. 75-95. [In Persian]
  14. Gleave, R. (2011). Ali b. Abi Talib. In: Encyclopedia of Islam, (3rd). Leiden: Brill.
  15. Goodman, C.J. (2008). What is a think tank? Retrieved 2 3, 2012, from Atlas USA: http://www.atlasusa.org/V2/files/pdfs/Chapter Goodman.pdf. p1-2.
  16. Ibn Abī Zaynab, M.I. (1983.) Al-Ghayba (Fihri, trans.). Tehran: Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyya. [In Persian]
  17. Kohlberg, E. (1975). Some Imāmī-shīʿī views on Taqiyya. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 95(3), pp. 395-402.
  18. Kohlberg, E.: Amir-Moezzi, M.A. (2009). Revelation and Falsification, The Kitāb al-qirā’āt of Ahmad b. Muhammad al-Sayyārī. Leiden: Brill.
  19. Ibn al-ʿUqda, A.M. (2003). Faḍāʾil Amīr al-Muʾminīn. Qom: Dalil-e Ma. [In Arabic]
  20. Mills, T., Griffin, T. & Miller, D. (2011). The Cold War on British Muslims: An examination of Policy Exchange and the Centre for Social Cohesion. Spin watch Foundation. URL= https://purehost.bath.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/232268/SpinwatchReport_ColdWar.pdf
  21. Nasr, S.H. (2015). The Heart of Islam. Tehran: Ney Publications. [In Persian]
  22. Nazir-Ali, M. (March 28, 2009). Controversial bishop quits Rochester diocese. The Guardian Newspaper.
  23. Rich, A. (2004). Think Tanks, Public Policy, and the Politics of Expertise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  24. Sanepour, M. (2016). An inquiry into the Western method of Shiite studies with a focus on ʿAlī’s imamate. Nahj al-balagha studies, 14(49), pp. 63-84. [In Persian]
  25. Scharbrot, O. 2020. The Study of Shia Islam in British Academia: Some Preliminary Reflections. University of Birmingham, Department of
  26. Schimmel, A. (1994). Deciphering the Signs of God: A Phenomenological Approach to Islam. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  27. Scott-Baumann, A., Guest, M., Naguib, S., Cheruvallil-Contractor, S. & Phoenix, A. (2020). Islam on campus: Contested identities and the cultures of higher education in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University
  28. Zaeri, Gh. & Ragheb, A. (2014). Vico’s historical methodology. Methodology of human sciences, 79, pp. 47-70. [In Persian]
Journal of Islamic Political Studies
Volume 6, Issue 2
July 2024
Pages 7-31

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics