The Discourse Analysis of the Concepts of Political Identity and Citizenship In Reformist and Fundamentalist Discourses (in 1370s-1380s SH)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Professor of Political Sciences in Baqer al-Oloom University, Qom, Iran

2 Assistant Professor in Research Center of Political Sciences and Thought, Qom, Iran

10.22081/jips.2021.72942

Abstract

Investigating the effect of globalization on political spheres is among the most important concerns for the scholars in that discipline. One of the most important subjects pertaining to globalization is the reaction of the political discourse to this unique phenomenon in human life. The issue dealt with in this study is focused on comparing the reaction of the reformist and fundamentalist political discourses (in 1370s-1380s in Iran) to the evolutions in the political identity and citizenship under the influence of globalization. The reason for choosing that period is the spread of objective manifestations of globalization with a dominance of western and liberal versions in that period. To do so, we have attempted to use the logic of equivalence and difference in discourse analysis of Laclau and Mouffe to analyze such a reaction. The most important achievement of the present study is that the reformist discourse – with Sayyid Muhammad Khatami, Iranian president of that time, as its representative – had more consonance and conformity with the spread of globalization. As a result, attracting the signifiers and the signs of globalization of the liberal discourse into the reformist discourse has accelerated in that discourse. On the contrary, the fundamentalist discourse – with Allamah Muhammad Taqi Mesbah as its intellectual representative – treated the globalized western discourse with a resisting identity approach to the logic of difference and distinction, defining and reconstructing its own signifiers and signs through a confrontation with globalization.

Keywords


  1. The Holy Quran.

    1. Castles, S. & Davidson, A. (2001). Citizenship and Migration: Globalization and the Politics of Belonging (Trans. Taqiloo, F.). Tehran: Research Center of Strategic Studies.
    2. Dowran, B. & Muhseni, M. (1382 SH). "Howiyyat, Rūykardhā wa Naẓariyihā" in ʿUlūm Tarbiyatī wa Rawānshināsī. 4 (1). pp. 39-90.
    3. Faulks, K. (2000). Citizenship (Trans. Delafrouz, M. T.). Tehran: Kawir Publications.
    4. Henry, B. (2001). "The Role of Symbols for European Political Identity" in: F. Cerutti, E. Rudolph (ed.). A Soul For Europe. Vol. 2. An Essay Collection, pp. 49-70.
    5. Khaleqi, A. (1382 SH). Qudrat, Zabān, Zindigī Rūzmarra dar Guftimān Falsafī-Siyāsī Muʿāṣir. Tehran: Gam Now.
    6. Khatami, S. M. (1373 SH). Az Dunyāyi Shahr tā Shahr Dunyā. Tehran: Ney Publications.
    7. Khatami, S. M. (1376 SH). Bīm Mowj. Tehran: Simayi Jawan Institute.
    8. Khatami, S. M. (1378 SH). Āyīn wa Andīsh dar Dām Khudkāmigī. Tehran: Tarh Now.
    9. Khatami, S. M. (1379 SH). Insān; Multaqāyi Mashriq Jān wa Maghrib ʿAql (collection of lectures and interviews). Tehran: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
    10. Khatami, S. M. (1386A). "Dar Sitāyish Dānishgāh" (Sayyid Muhammad Khatami's Speeches and Writings). Tehran: International Institute of Development of Civil Concepts.
    11. Khatami, S. M. (1386B). "Bārān dar Kawīr" (Sayyid Muhammad Khatami's Speeches and Writings) Tehran: Intelligent Schools.
    12. Laclau E. & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony & Socialist Strategy. London: Sage Publications.
    13. Mesbah, M. T. (1378 SH). Silsila Mabāḥith Islām, Siyāsat wa Ḥukū Tehran: Office of Political Studies and Investigations, Organization of Islamic Propagations.
    14. Mesbah, M. T. (1380 SH). Naẓariya Ḥuqūqī Islā Qom: Publishing Center of Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute.
    15. Nijati Husseini, S. M. (1383 SH). Waqiʿiyyat Ijtimāʿī Shahrwandī dar Iran (1376-1380). Tehran: Islamic Azad University, Branch of Sciences and Researches (PhD Dissertation in Sociology/ 1382-1383 SH).
    16. Whitebrook, M. (2001). "Globalization or the Age of Transition?" in International Sociology, June, Vol. 15. pp. 251-267.