Feasibility Study of Islamic Theory of International Relations

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Faculty of International Relations, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran: Iran.

10.22081/jips.2020.69404

Abstract

Different approaches and perspectives can be suggested on the feasibility and dismissal of the Islamic theory of international relations. The present paper suggests that the processing of the Islamic theory of international relations based on the assumptions derived from Islamic texts and doctrines employing logic, and a valid and justified Islamic method is conceivable within the framework of the Islamic worldview through criticizing and further reflection of the arguments and claims of those who dismiss the feasibility of the Islamic theory of international relations. This Islamic founding theory holds an explanatory, developmental, critical, and normative nature, the purpose of which is to describe, explain, understand, and interpret the existing international relations and further illustrate how it evolves and shifts and then establishes the convenient international order.

Keywords


Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (2010). Non-Western International Relations Theory. London and New York: Routledge.
Ali Zamani, A. A. (2004). Science, Rationality, and Religion (Introduction to New Theology). Qom: Qom University Press.
Baqeri, Kh. (2006). The Founding Model of Religious Science in the Viewpoint of Dr. Khosrow Bagheri (H. Hassani, M. Alipour, & M. T. Abtahi, Ed.). Religious Science, Views and Considerations. Qom: Research Institute of Hawzah and University.
Barbour, I. (1983). Science and Religion. Tehran: University Publishing Center.
Bhargava, R. (1998). Secularism and its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University press.
Burchill, S., & Linklater, A. (2005). Theories of International Relations. London and New York : Macmillan Palgrave.
Dark, K. R. (2000). Religion and International Relations. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Dehqani Firoozabadi, S. J. (2003). Evolution of theories of conflict and cooperation in international relations. Law and Politics Research, 5(8), pp. 73-117.
Dehqani Firoozabadi, S. J. (2010 a). How and what is the Islamic theory of international relations. Political Science Research, 5(2), pp. 111-142.
Dehqani Firoozabadi, S. J. (2012). The Pattern of World Order in the Islamic Theory of International Relations. International Relations Research, 2(3), pp. 9-47.
Esposito, J. L. (2000). Islam and Secularism in the Twenty – First Century (J. L. Esposito & A. Tamimi, Eds.). Islam and Secularism in the Middle East. New York: New York University press.
Fox, J., & Sandler, Sh. (2004). Bringing Religion into International Relations. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Golshani, M. (2006). Science, Religion, and Knowledge at the Threshold of the 21st Century. Tehran: Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies.
Golshani, M. (2011). Science and Religion, Harmony or Conflict. Information of Wisdom and Knowledge, 6(11), pp. 4-8.
Griffiths, M. (2007). Worldviews and IR theory, Conquest or Coexistence?  International Relations Theory for the Twenty – first Century. London: Routledge.
Haqiqat, S. S. (1997). Transnational Responsibilities in the Foreign Policy of the Islamic State. Tehran: Center for Strategic Research.
Hollis, M., & Smith, S. (1991). Explaining and Understanding in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University press.
Hot, J. F. (2003). Science and religion from conflict to dialogue. Qom: Taha.
Javadi Amoli, A. (2007). The status of reason in the geometry of religious knowledge (A. Vaezi, Ed.). Qom: Esra.
Khaki Qaramaleki, M. R. (2008). Religion and Modern Science: A Study on the Relationship and Challenges of Science and Religion in the Field of Objectivity. Pegah Hozeh,  (235).
Maggie, B. (1995). Men of Thought: The Creators of Contemporary Philosophy. Tehran: Andisheh-ye-No.
Mansbach, R. W. & Vasques, J. A. (1981). In Search of Theory: A New Paradigm for Global Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Nandy, A. (1998). The Politics of Secularism and the Recovery of Religious Toleration. Secularism and its Critics (R. Bhargava, Ed). Oxford: Oxford University press.
Northbourne, L. (2011). The Challenge of New Religion and Science (S. H. Azarkar, Trans.). Information Wisdom and Knowledge Monthly, 6(11), pp. 16-21.
Philpott, D. (2002). The Challenge of September 11 to Secularism in International Relations. World Politics, 55(1), pp. 66-95.
Phipott, D. (2000). The Religious Roots of Modern International Relations. World Politics, 2(52), pp. 206-245.
Puchala, D. (2004). Theory and History in International Relations. New York: Routledge.
Putnam, H. (1995). Philosophy of Science: Interview with Hillary Putnam. (B. Maggie, Ed.). Men of Thought: Creators of Contemporary Philosophy. Tehran: Tarh-e No.
Russell, R. J., Stöger, W. R., & Kevin, G. (2005). Physics, Philosophy and Theology. Tehran: Research Institute for Islamic Culture and Thought.
Shakman Hurd, E. (2004). The Political Authority of Secularism in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 10(2), pp. 235–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066104042936.
Shakman Hurd, E. (2008). The Politics of Secularism in International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Snyder, J. (2009). Religion and International Relations Theory. Retrieved from http://www.princeton.edu/politics/events/repository/public/faculty/Snyder_Religion_and_IR_Theory.pdf.-
Soroush, A. K. (2006). Islam and Social Sciences: A Critique of the Religionization of Science (S. H. Hassani, M. Alipour, & S. M. T. Movahed Abtahi, Eds.). Religious Science. Qom: Research Institute of Hawzah and University.
Tibi, B. (2000). Post-bipolar order in crisis: The challenge of politicised Islam. Millennium, 29(3), 843-859.
Vasques, J. (1992). World Politics Theory (M. Hawkeworth, & M. Kogan, Eds.). Encyclopedia of government and politics. London: Routledge.
Waltz, K. N. (1990). Realist thought and neorealist theory. Journal of International Affairs, (44), pp. 21-37